Serveur d'exploration sur le peuplier

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Long-term effects of defoliation on quaking aspen in relation to genotype and nutrient availability: plant growth, phytochemistry and insect performance.

Identifieur interne : 004237 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 004236; suivant : 004238

Long-term effects of defoliation on quaking aspen in relation to genotype and nutrient availability: plant growth, phytochemistry and insect performance.

Auteurs : Tod L. Osier [États-Unis] ; Richard L. Lindroth

Source :

RBID : pubmed:14740291

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

This research tested the long-term effects of defoliation on aspen chemistry and growth in relation to genotype and nutrient availability. We grew saplings of four aspen genotypes in a common garden under two conditions of nutrient availability, and subsequently subjected them to two levels of artificial defoliation. Artificial defoliation suppressed plant growth, and saplings of the four genotypes did not show evidence of genetic variation in tolerance to defoliation. Phenolic glycoside concentrations did not respond to defoliation, but were influenced by genotype and nutrient availability. Condensed tannins responded to defoliation and varied among genotypes. Although defoliation affected condensed tannins, plant quality was not altered in a manner important for gypsy moth performance. Regression analyses suggested that phenolic glycoside concentrations accounted for most of the variation in insect performance. The lack of a strong response important for herbivores was surprising given the severity of the defoliation treatment (nearly 100% of leaf area was removed). In this study, plant genotype was of primary importance, nutrient availability was of secondary importance and long-term induced responses were unimportant as determinants of insect performance.

DOI: 10.1007/s00442-003-1481-3
PubMed: 14740291


Affiliations:


Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Long-term effects of defoliation on quaking aspen in relation to genotype and nutrient availability: plant growth, phytochemistry and insect performance.</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Osier, Tod L" sort="Osier, Tod L" uniqKey="Osier T" first="Tod L" last="Osier">Tod L. Osier</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="2">
<nlm:affiliation>Department of Entomology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1630 Linden Drive, Madison, WI 53706, USA. tosier@mail.fairfield.edu</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Entomology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1630 Linden Drive, Madison, WI 53706</wicri:regionArea>
<placeName>
<region type="state">Wisconsin</region>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Lindroth, Richard L" sort="Lindroth, Richard L" uniqKey="Lindroth R" first="Richard L" last="Lindroth">Richard L. Lindroth</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno>
<date when="2004">2004</date>
<idno type="RBID">pubmed:14740291</idno>
<idno type="pmid">14740291</idno>
<idno type="doi">10.1007/s00442-003-1481-3</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">004353</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">004353</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">004353</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Curation">004353</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">004353</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en">Long-term effects of defoliation on quaking aspen in relation to genotype and nutrient availability: plant growth, phytochemistry and insect performance.</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Osier, Tod L" sort="Osier, Tod L" uniqKey="Osier T" first="Tod L" last="Osier">Tod L. Osier</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="2">
<nlm:affiliation>Department of Entomology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1630 Linden Drive, Madison, WI 53706, USA. tosier@mail.fairfield.edu</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Entomology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1630 Linden Drive, Madison, WI 53706</wicri:regionArea>
<placeName>
<region type="state">Wisconsin</region>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Lindroth, Richard L" sort="Lindroth, Richard L" uniqKey="Lindroth R" first="Richard L" last="Lindroth">Richard L. Lindroth</name>
</author>
</analytic>
<series>
<title level="j">Oecologia</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0029-8549</idno>
<imprint>
<date when="2004" type="published">2004</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Adaptation, Physiological (MeSH)</term>
<term>Animals (MeSH)</term>
<term>Feeding Behavior (MeSH)</term>
<term>Genotype (MeSH)</term>
<term>Glycosides (analysis)</term>
<term>Glycosides (pharmacology)</term>
<term>Insecta (MeSH)</term>
<term>Nutritive Value (MeSH)</term>
<term>Plant Leaves (chemistry)</term>
<term>Plants, Edible (MeSH)</term>
<term>Populus (chemistry)</term>
<term>Populus (growth & development)</term>
<term>Regression Analysis (MeSH)</term>
<term>Tannins (analysis)</term>
<term>Tannins (pharmacology)</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Adaptation physiologique (MeSH)</term>
<term>Analyse de régression (MeSH)</term>
<term>Animaux (MeSH)</term>
<term>Comportement alimentaire (MeSH)</term>
<term>Feuilles de plante (composition chimique)</term>
<term>Génotype (MeSH)</term>
<term>Hétérosides (analyse)</term>
<term>Hétérosides (pharmacologie)</term>
<term>Insectes (MeSH)</term>
<term>Plantes comestibles (MeSH)</term>
<term>Populus (composition chimique)</term>
<term>Populus (croissance et développement)</term>
<term>Tanins (analyse)</term>
<term>Tanins (pharmacologie)</term>
<term>Valeur nutritive (MeSH)</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" qualifier="analysis" xml:lang="en">
<term>Glycosides</term>
<term>Tannins</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" qualifier="pharmacology" xml:lang="en">
<term>Glycosides</term>
<term>Tannins</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="analyse" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Hétérosides</term>
<term>Tanins</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="chemistry" xml:lang="en">
<term>Plant Leaves</term>
<term>Populus</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="composition chimique" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Feuilles de plante</term>
<term>Populus</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="croissance et développement" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Populus</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="growth & development" xml:lang="en">
<term>Populus</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="pharmacologie" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Hétérosides</term>
<term>Tanins</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en">
<term>Adaptation, Physiological</term>
<term>Animals</term>
<term>Feeding Behavior</term>
<term>Genotype</term>
<term>Insecta</term>
<term>Nutritive Value</term>
<term>Plants, Edible</term>
<term>Regression Analysis</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Adaptation physiologique</term>
<term>Analyse de régression</term>
<term>Animaux</term>
<term>Comportement alimentaire</term>
<term>Génotype</term>
<term>Insectes</term>
<term>Plantes comestibles</term>
<term>Valeur nutritive</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">This research tested the long-term effects of defoliation on aspen chemistry and growth in relation to genotype and nutrient availability. We grew saplings of four aspen genotypes in a common garden under two conditions of nutrient availability, and subsequently subjected them to two levels of artificial defoliation. Artificial defoliation suppressed plant growth, and saplings of the four genotypes did not show evidence of genetic variation in tolerance to defoliation. Phenolic glycoside concentrations did not respond to defoliation, but were influenced by genotype and nutrient availability. Condensed tannins responded to defoliation and varied among genotypes. Although defoliation affected condensed tannins, plant quality was not altered in a manner important for gypsy moth performance. Regression analyses suggested that phenolic glycoside concentrations accounted for most of the variation in insect performance. The lack of a strong response important for herbivores was surprising given the severity of the defoliation treatment (nearly 100% of leaf area was removed). In this study, plant genotype was of primary importance, nutrient availability was of secondary importance and long-term induced responses were unimportant as determinants of insect performance.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<pubmed>
<MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM">
<PMID Version="1">14740291</PMID>
<DateCompleted>
<Year>2004</Year>
<Month>07</Month>
<Day>21</Day>
</DateCompleted>
<DateRevised>
<Year>2018</Year>
<Month>11</Month>
<Day>13</Day>
</DateRevised>
<Article PubModel="Print-Electronic">
<Journal>
<ISSN IssnType="Print">0029-8549</ISSN>
<JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print">
<Volume>139</Volume>
<Issue>1</Issue>
<PubDate>
<Year>2004</Year>
<Month>Mar</Month>
</PubDate>
</JournalIssue>
<Title>Oecologia</Title>
<ISOAbbreviation>Oecologia</ISOAbbreviation>
</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Long-term effects of defoliation on quaking aspen in relation to genotype and nutrient availability: plant growth, phytochemistry and insect performance.</ArticleTitle>
<Pagination>
<MedlinePgn>55-65</MedlinePgn>
</Pagination>
<Abstract>
<AbstractText>This research tested the long-term effects of defoliation on aspen chemistry and growth in relation to genotype and nutrient availability. We grew saplings of four aspen genotypes in a common garden under two conditions of nutrient availability, and subsequently subjected them to two levels of artificial defoliation. Artificial defoliation suppressed plant growth, and saplings of the four genotypes did not show evidence of genetic variation in tolerance to defoliation. Phenolic glycoside concentrations did not respond to defoliation, but were influenced by genotype and nutrient availability. Condensed tannins responded to defoliation and varied among genotypes. Although defoliation affected condensed tannins, plant quality was not altered in a manner important for gypsy moth performance. Regression analyses suggested that phenolic glycoside concentrations accounted for most of the variation in insect performance. The lack of a strong response important for herbivores was surprising given the severity of the defoliation treatment (nearly 100% of leaf area was removed). In this study, plant genotype was of primary importance, nutrient availability was of secondary importance and long-term induced responses were unimportant as determinants of insect performance.</AbstractText>
</Abstract>
<AuthorList CompleteYN="Y">
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>Osier</LastName>
<ForeName>Tod L</ForeName>
<Initials>TL</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo>
<Affiliation>Department of Entomology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1630 Linden Drive, Madison, WI 53706, USA. tosier@mail.fairfield.edu</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>Lindroth</LastName>
<ForeName>Richard L</ForeName>
<Initials>RL</Initials>
</Author>
</AuthorList>
<Language>eng</Language>
<PublicationTypeList>
<PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType>
<PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType>
<PublicationType UI="D013486">Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.</PublicationType>
</PublicationTypeList>
<ArticleDate DateType="Electronic">
<Year>2004</Year>
<Month>01</Month>
<Day>23</Day>
</ArticleDate>
</Article>
<MedlineJournalInfo>
<Country>Germany</Country>
<MedlineTA>Oecologia</MedlineTA>
<NlmUniqueID>0150372</NlmUniqueID>
<ISSNLinking>0029-8549</ISSNLinking>
</MedlineJournalInfo>
<ChemicalList>
<Chemical>
<RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber>
<NameOfSubstance UI="D006027">Glycosides</NameOfSubstance>
</Chemical>
<Chemical>
<RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber>
<NameOfSubstance UI="D013634">Tannins</NameOfSubstance>
</Chemical>
</ChemicalList>
<CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset>
<MeshHeadingList>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D000222" MajorTopicYN="N">Adaptation, Physiological</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D000818" MajorTopicYN="N">Animals</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D005247" MajorTopicYN="N">Feeding Behavior</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D005838" MajorTopicYN="N">Genotype</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D006027" MajorTopicYN="N">Glycosides</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000032" MajorTopicYN="Y">analysis</QualifierName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000494" MajorTopicYN="N">pharmacology</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D007313" MajorTopicYN="N">Insecta</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D009753" MajorTopicYN="N">Nutritive Value</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D018515" MajorTopicYN="N">Plant Leaves</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000737" MajorTopicYN="N">chemistry</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D010945" MajorTopicYN="N">Plants, Edible</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D032107" MajorTopicYN="N">Populus</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000737" MajorTopicYN="N">chemistry</QualifierName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000254" MajorTopicYN="Y">growth & development</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D012044" MajorTopicYN="N">Regression Analysis</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D013634" MajorTopicYN="N">Tannins</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000032" MajorTopicYN="Y">analysis</QualifierName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000494" MajorTopicYN="N">pharmacology</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
</MeshHeadingList>
</MedlineCitation>
<PubmedData>
<History>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received">
<Year>2003</Year>
<Month>05</Month>
<Day>15</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted">
<Year>2003</Year>
<Month>12</Month>
<Day>11</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed">
<Year>2004</Year>
<Month>1</Month>
<Day>24</Day>
<Hour>5</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline">
<Year>2004</Year>
<Month>7</Month>
<Day>22</Day>
<Hour>5</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez">
<Year>2004</Year>
<Month>1</Month>
<Day>24</Day>
<Hour>5</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
</History>
<PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">14740291</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1007/s00442-003-1481-3</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
<ReferenceList>
<Reference>
<Citation>Evolution. 1998 Jun;52(3):703-712</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">28565253</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Oecologia. 1995 Dec;104(4):487-495</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">28307664</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Evolution. 1999 Aug;53(4):1093-1104</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">28565524</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Oecologia. 1998 Aug;116(1-2):182-190</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">28308525</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Oecologia. 1997 Jun;111(1):99-108</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">28307511</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Oecologia. 1989 Oct;81(2):242-248</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">28312543</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Trends Ecol Evol. 1990 Mar;5(3):91-3</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21232330</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Oecologia. 2001 Feb;126(3):371-379</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">28547451</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>J Chem Ecol. 1996 Apr;22(4):765-71</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">24227583</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>J Chem Ecol. 1995 Jul;21(7):883-96</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">24234407</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>J Chem Ecol. 1989 Sep;15(9):2335-46</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">24272421</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>J Chem Ecol. 2001 Jul;27(7):1289-313</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">11504029</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Oecologia. 1995 Jul;103(1):79-88</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">28306948</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Oecologia. 1999 Aug;120(2):295-303</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">28308092</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Oecologia. 1987 Dec;74(3):363-369</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">28312474</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Evolution. 2000 Feb;54(1):51-63</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">10937183</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Trends Ecol Evol. 1999 May;14(5):179-185</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">10322530</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>J Agric Food Chem. 1980 Sep-Oct;28(5):947-52</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">7462522</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Oecologia. 1987 Oct;73(4):513-517</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">28311966</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Oecologia. 1987 Jul;72 (4):510-514</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">28312511</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
</ReferenceList>
</PubmedData>
</pubmed>
<affiliations>
<list>
<country>
<li>États-Unis</li>
</country>
<region>
<li>Wisconsin</li>
</region>
</list>
<tree>
<noCountry>
<name sortKey="Lindroth, Richard L" sort="Lindroth, Richard L" uniqKey="Lindroth R" first="Richard L" last="Lindroth">Richard L. Lindroth</name>
</noCountry>
<country name="États-Unis">
<region name="Wisconsin">
<name sortKey="Osier, Tod L" sort="Osier, Tod L" uniqKey="Osier T" first="Tod L" last="Osier">Tod L. Osier</name>
</region>
</country>
</tree>
</affiliations>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Bois/explor/PoplarV1/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 004237 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 004237 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Bois
   |area=    PoplarV1
   |flux=    Main
   |étape=   Exploration
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     pubmed:14740291
   |texte=   Long-term effects of defoliation on quaking aspen in relation to genotype and nutrient availability: plant growth, phytochemistry and insect performance.
}}

Pour générer des pages wiki

HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/RBID.i   -Sk "pubmed:14740291" \
       | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd   \
       | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a PoplarV1 

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.37.
Data generation: Wed Nov 18 12:07:19 2020. Site generation: Wed Nov 18 12:16:31 2020